Archive for the ‘Fun’ Category

On the radio about orangutans

Thursday, March 10th, 2011

I'm working on a text book chapter and am a few weeks past the deadline, so I haven't had time to blog lately. I have a few things I'd like to write about as soon as I am done with the chapter, but in the mean time here's a podcast radio interview with me and Mikkel Schierup (in Danish, though, sorry about that):

Symphony of science

Thursday, February 17th, 2011

Featuring some of my greatest scientific idols, including Feynman and Sagan

Oh no...

Thursday, February 17th, 2011

Is blogs really science journalism? Maybe not, but the science news I get, I mainly get from great blogs, so even if it isn't "proper" science journalism, I think I can say that it is where at least some scientists get their news.

So it is a bit strange when a press officer doesn't want to talk to bloggers.

I know that I would absolutely love to have my research mentioned by Ed Young -- I've been reading his Not Exactly Rocket Science for years -- so if a press officer at AU didn't give him all the information he wanted, I'd be rather miffed.

Virgins

Sunday, February 6th, 2011

I'm watching the latest episode of Supernatural, titled Like a virgin, and something strikes me. In all other aspects of life, experience is a good thing. Howcome, when it comes to sex, not knowing what the hell you are doing is a virtue?

Humans are crazy, it is time to give the bonobos a chance at the top of the food chain.

Completely beside the point, naming a website Virgen scan for virus gene scans is a bad idea. You won't get the right kind of visitors. I know.

Loved this exchange in the episode of Supernatural:

Dean: So what can you tell me about dragons.

Bobby: They are not like the Loch Ness monster, dragons aren't real!

Dean: Can you make a few calls?

Bobby: To where? Hogwarts?

Some places, not everywhere...

Wednesday, January 26th, 2011

Just to avoid confusion, if you read this, it doesn't imply this.

We are suggesting that humans and orangutans are closer related than either to the chimpanzees in ~0.5% of the genome (and chimpanzees and orangutans are closer related than either to humans in another ~0.5%). That has to do with incomplete lineage sorting, and does not, in any way, imply that we as a species are closer related to orangutans than to chimpanzees.

Oh, and it doesn't really mean that orangutan is our closest living relative in ~0.5% of the genome either. It is just closer than chimpanzee, but the gorilla could be closer related to us in those positions, so...