<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh my, has it really been that long?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/12/03/oh-my-has-it-really-been-that-long/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/12/03/oh-my-has-it-really-been-that-long/</link>
	<description>Computer science, bioinformatics, genetics, and everything in between</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:35:39 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Mailund</title>
		<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/12/03/oh-my-has-it-really-been-that-long/comment-page-1/#comment-4575</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Mailund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailund.dk/?p=1990#comment-4575</guid>
		<description>Yes, it is indeed the repetitive regions that are problematic, and with the current technology it is probably too expensive to complete the genomes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is indeed the repetitive regions that are problematic, and with the current technology it is probably too expensive to complete the genomes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roald</title>
		<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/12/03/oh-my-has-it-really-been-that-long/comment-page-1/#comment-4574</link>
		<dc:creator>Roald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailund.dk/?p=1990#comment-4574</guid>
		<description>I guess what matters with eukaryotes is that large genomes are mainly a consequence of many repeats, so one could say that there are only two really complex repeat-rich genomes that have been finished to a satisfying degree. That is really quite discouraging, but one could hope that new technologies, especially very long read sequencing and new technological alternatives to BAC cloning, will remedy this. Otherwise we will continue to see a flurry of poorly finished and poorly annotated genomes coming out. 
It would be especially nice to see a polyploid genome finished to a satisfying degree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess what matters with eukaryotes is that large genomes are mainly a consequence of many repeats, so one could say that there are only two really complex repeat-rich genomes that have been finished to a satisfying degree. That is really quite discouraging, but one could hope that new technologies, especially very long read sequencing and new technological alternatives to BAC cloning, will remedy this. Otherwise we will continue to see a flurry of poorly finished and poorly annotated genomes coming out.<br />
It would be especially nice to see a polyploid genome finished to a satisfying degree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Mailund</title>
		<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/12/03/oh-my-has-it-really-been-that-long/comment-page-1/#comment-4573</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Mailund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailund.dk/?p=1990#comment-4573</guid>
		<description>Jonathan: Sorry, I thought it was clear from context that I wasn&#039;t referring to prokaryotes where, you are right, we have quite a few more completed genomes. 979 completed genomes, according to NCBI.

I&#039;m not saying that the prokaryotic genomes are not interesting or anything -- they definitely are -- but it is not the genomes that show up in the news, usually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan: Sorry, I thought it was clear from context that I wasn&#8217;t referring to prokaryotes where, you are right, we have quite a few more completed genomes. 979 completed genomes, according to NCBI.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that the prokaryotic genomes are not interesting or anything &#8212; they definitely are &#8212; but it is not the genomes that show up in the news, usually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Badger</title>
		<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/12/03/oh-my-has-it-really-been-that-long/comment-page-1/#comment-4564</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Badger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailund.dk/?p=1990#comment-4564</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Only the human and mouse genome are really considered “complete”, the rest are just drafts and in many cases there are still many issues to work out with over-collapsed assemblies and such and with all the troublesome regions missing.&lt;/em&gt;

Er...human, mouse, and over 1000 complete prokaryotic genomes. You know, the genomes that actually contain novel genes. Euks (especially the mammals) are all just basically minor variations of each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Only the human and mouse genome are really considered “complete”, the rest are just drafts and in many cases there are still many issues to work out with over-collapsed assemblies and such and with all the troublesome regions missing.</em></p>
<p>Er&#8230;human, mouse, and over 1000 complete prokaryotic genomes. You know, the genomes that actually contain novel genes. Euks (especially the mammals) are all just basically minor variations of each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Mailund</title>
		<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/12/03/oh-my-has-it-really-been-that-long/comment-page-1/#comment-4563</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Mailund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailund.dk/?p=1990#comment-4563</guid>
		<description>They are ~100Mbp and ~250Mbp in size, as far as I remember off the top of my head, so perhaps semi-large ;-)  An order of magnitude smaller than what I had in mind, though, thinking of the human genome.

They are considered completed, though, so you are right.

For a list of genome projects with status, see http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/static/gpstat.html  There&#039;s four animal genomes completed, C elegans, D melanogaster (short-ish animal genomes) in addition to man and mouse.  There&#039;s also four plan genomes completed, with rice being the other one in addition to A thaliana.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are ~100Mbp and ~250Mbp in size, as far as I remember off the top of my head, so perhaps semi-large ;-)  An order of magnitude smaller than what I had in mind, though, thinking of the human genome.</p>
<p>They are considered completed, though, so you are right.</p>
<p>For a list of genome projects with status, see <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/static/gpstat.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/static/gpstat.html</a>  There&#8217;s four animal genomes completed, C elegans, D melanogaster (short-ish animal genomes) in addition to man and mouse.  There&#8217;s also four plan genomes completed, with rice being the other one in addition to A thaliana.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roald</title>
		<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/12/03/oh-my-has-it-really-been-that-long/comment-page-1/#comment-4562</link>
		<dc:creator>Roald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailund.dk/?p=1990#comment-4562</guid>
		<description>I do not know if you count them as large, but I would argue that the C Elgans and Arabidobsis genomes are also finished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not know if you count them as large, but I would argue that the C Elgans and Arabidobsis genomes are also finished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

