<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If it&#8217;s true, it is not libel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/11/04/if-its-true-it-is-not-libel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/11/04/if-its-true-it-is-not-libel/</link>
	<description>Computer science, bioinformatics, genetics, and everything in between</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:35:39 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. Mahdi</title>
		<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/11/04/if-its-true-it-is-not-libel/comment-page-1/#comment-25873</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Mahdi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 22:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailund.dk/?p=1950#comment-25873</guid>
		<description>Quite honestly I trust Prof. Mohamed El Naschie far more than I trust the judgement of Nature.  I do not consider it outlandish to suggest a Nobel prize for El Naschie.  Let me give you the rationale behind my conclusion.  Surely you heard about the two genius Russian born scientists Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov.  I was present at a talk involving the two lucky but deserving winners of the Nobel Prize of this year (2010).  What they recounted speaks for the magazine Science and speaks against Nature.  They said their paper was eventually published when they submitted it to Science.  They added it was rejected twice by Nature.  Something very unnatural is happening to Nature.  Instead of publishing defamatory tabloid articles against El Naschie they should have at least published the paper of the two ingenious Nobel winners of this year.  Nature also refused to publish the paper reporting the experimental discovery of the golden mean in quantum mechanics by the Helmholtz Center and Oxford University.  It was again Science which published the article.  A year or so later after the publication in Science, Nature overcame themselves to publish a short article about the article published in Science.  When one of my colleagues who is aware of El Naschie’s papers and findings on the golden mean in quantum mechanics wrote a comment about El Naschie’s achievement and sent it to Nature, they refused even to acknowledge the bare facts.  It is really becoming a personal war declared by Nature against El Naschie.  The looser is the scientific community and science.  In fact Nature is losing in a big way by publishing doubtful papers on climatology and ignoring fundamental and path breaking work because they will otherwise be forced to mention the name of El Naschie.  It is unreal.  Who thought Nature would behave in such a fashion?  There seems to be something fundamentally wrong with the way Nature is being run at present.  Of course Nature is the world’s most famous science magazine for everyone.  The sooner they undertake self correction, the better it will be for everybody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite honestly I trust Prof. Mohamed El Naschie far more than I trust the judgement of Nature.  I do not consider it outlandish to suggest a Nobel prize for El Naschie.  Let me give you the rationale behind my conclusion.  Surely you heard about the two genius Russian born scientists Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov.  I was present at a talk involving the two lucky but deserving winners of the Nobel Prize of this year (2010).  What they recounted speaks for the magazine Science and speaks against Nature.  They said their paper was eventually published when they submitted it to Science.  They added it was rejected twice by Nature.  Something very unnatural is happening to Nature.  Instead of publishing defamatory tabloid articles against El Naschie they should have at least published the paper of the two ingenious Nobel winners of this year.  Nature also refused to publish the paper reporting the experimental discovery of the golden mean in quantum mechanics by the Helmholtz Center and Oxford University.  It was again Science which published the article.  A year or so later after the publication in Science, Nature overcame themselves to publish a short article about the article published in Science.  When one of my colleagues who is aware of El Naschie’s papers and findings on the golden mean in quantum mechanics wrote a comment about El Naschie’s achievement and sent it to Nature, they refused even to acknowledge the bare facts.  It is really becoming a personal war declared by Nature against El Naschie.  The looser is the scientific community and science.  In fact Nature is losing in a big way by publishing doubtful papers on climatology and ignoring fundamental and path breaking work because they will otherwise be forced to mention the name of El Naschie.  It is unreal.  Who thought Nature would behave in such a fashion?  There seems to be something fundamentally wrong with the way Nature is being run at present.  Of course Nature is the world’s most famous science magazine for everyone.  The sooner they undertake self correction, the better it will be for everybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/11/04/if-its-true-it-is-not-libel/comment-page-1/#comment-4998</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailund.dk/?p=1950#comment-4998</guid>
		<description>A. Tolba, or should I call you &lt;a href=&quot;http://elnaschiewatch.blogspot.com/2009/04/jihan-fadel.html#brothers&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Amr Elnaschai&lt;/a&gt;, won&#039;t you please &lt;a href=&quot;http://elnaschiewatch.blogspot.com/2010/03/leave-jihan-alone.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;leave Jihan alone!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A. Tolba, or should I call you <a href="http://elnaschiewatch.blogspot.com/2009/04/jihan-fadel.html#brothers" rel="nofollow">Amr Elnaschai</a>, won&#8217;t you please <a href="http://elnaschiewatch.blogspot.com/2010/03/leave-jihan-alone.html" rel="nofollow">leave Jihan alone!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Tolba</title>
		<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/11/04/if-its-true-it-is-not-libel/comment-page-1/#comment-4962</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Tolba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailund.dk/?p=1950#comment-4962</guid>
		<description>Said I say it really with no hatred. You have damaged and ruined your future. Your name is mud among everyone who knows you. Call Ibrahim Fawzi. Call Amr Salama. Call any of the respectable Ministers who used to shake hands with you. They will run away now from you in horror. You know no limits. Your hate and jealousy of Mohamed is phenomenal. Abel and Cane is nothing but a small chapter in the epic you have written regarding how low someone can go regarding a family feud. Dont you know the word shame. Arent you ashamed of yourself and of all what you have caused to the good name of your family.  Be sure I am not Mohamed. Be also sure that everytime I read your name or see your picture I feel infinite pain for what has become out of you. You just google your name in Egypt or abroad - try it and you find the truth about Said: www.saidelnashaie.blogspot.com. I wish I were dead before I see this day and quite honestly Said you are worth more dead than alive. You and Shadia, Jihan and Hisham as well as the crooked Ahmed Gaber of Chemonix, the fake environmental company and the first place in Guiness book of World Records of lawlessness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Said I say it really with no hatred. You have damaged and ruined your future. Your name is mud among everyone who knows you. Call Ibrahim Fawzi. Call Amr Salama. Call any of the respectable Ministers who used to shake hands with you. They will run away now from you in horror. You know no limits. Your hate and jealousy of Mohamed is phenomenal. Abel and Cane is nothing but a small chapter in the epic you have written regarding how low someone can go regarding a family feud. Dont you know the word shame. Arent you ashamed of yourself and of all what you have caused to the good name of your family.  Be sure I am not Mohamed. Be also sure that everytime I read your name or see your picture I feel infinite pain for what has become out of you. You just google your name in Egypt or abroad &#8211; try it and you find the truth about Said: <a href="http://www.saidelnashaie.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.saidelnashaie.blogspot.com</a>. I wish I were dead before I see this day and quite honestly Said you are worth more dead than alive. You and Shadia, Jihan and Hisham as well as the crooked Ahmed Gaber of Chemonix, the fake environmental company and the first place in Guiness book of World Records of lawlessness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E-Infinity</title>
		<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/11/04/if-its-true-it-is-not-libel/comment-page-1/#comment-4961</link>
		<dc:creator>E-Infinity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailund.dk/?p=1950#comment-4961</guid>
		<description>A Slovenian scientist and mathematician following Mohamed El Naschie expand the idea of mechanical oscillators. Many papers have been published on this subject by L. Marek-Crnjac. Take a two degree of freedom oscillator. Two masses connected by two linear springs. Write the equation of motion. Set the value for the masses as well as the spring constants equal unity. The secular equation is then simply a quadratic equation. The Eigen values are golden mean related. The only positive real Eigen value is the golden mean. Imagine now that you have infinitely many such oscillators connected together. Consequently you can estimate the Eigen value using two well known theorems on Eigen values. These are the Southwell theorem and the Dunkerly theorem. They correspond to what we have studied in school about joining electrical resistance of Ome’s law. When they are successive you add the inverses and when they are parallel you add them. Eigen values are frequencies. Frequencies are energy and energy is mass. Extrapolating the whole thing to quantum mechanics as argued by El Naschie and Marek-Crnjac you have another plausibility explanation for why the golden mean will pop up in any accurate measurement in quantum mechanics phenomenon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Slovenian scientist and mathematician following Mohamed El Naschie expand the idea of mechanical oscillators. Many papers have been published on this subject by L. Marek-Crnjac. Take a two degree of freedom oscillator. Two masses connected by two linear springs. Write the equation of motion. Set the value for the masses as well as the spring constants equal unity. The secular equation is then simply a quadratic equation. The Eigen values are golden mean related. The only positive real Eigen value is the golden mean. Imagine now that you have infinitely many such oscillators connected together. Consequently you can estimate the Eigen value using two well known theorems on Eigen values. These are the Southwell theorem and the Dunkerly theorem. They correspond to what we have studied in school about joining electrical resistance of Ome’s law. When they are successive you add the inverses and when they are parallel you add them. Eigen values are frequencies. Frequencies are energy and energy is mass. Extrapolating the whole thing to quantum mechanics as argued by El Naschie and Marek-Crnjac you have another plausibility explanation for why the golden mean will pop up in any accurate measurement in quantum mechanics phenomenon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/11/04/if-its-true-it-is-not-libel/comment-page-1/#comment-4860</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 06:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailund.dk/?p=1950#comment-4860</guid>
		<description>You can imagine what sort of junk could be published in CSF journal.  You may not know that Huan is one of the great supporter of E-infinity theory and who nominated El naschie for a nobel prize!!!! 

You can check yours self a typical paper for Huan using E-infinity theory, and I think a high school student can easily judge that this absolute trash. 

Hierarchy of wool fibers and its interpretation using E-infinity theory

Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals,

Chaos,Solitons and Fractals 41 (2009)1839 –1841

Ji-Huan He, Zhong-Fu Ren, Jie Fan, Lan Xu

Abstract

Why do wool fibers show excellent advantages in warmth-retaining and many other practical properties? The paper concludes that their hierarchical structure is the key. Using E-infinity theory, its Hausdorff dimension is estimated to be about 4.2325, very close to El Naschie’s E-infinity dimension, 4.2360, revealing an optimal structure for wool fibers. 

Then the same article again with little modifications

Hierarchy of Wool Fibers and Fractal Dimensions

International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation,9(3),293-296, 2008

http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=103


7&amp;context=ji_huan_he

Abstract

Wool fiber shows excellent advantages in warmth-retaining and many other practical properties possibly due to its hierarchical structure. Its fractal dimension of wool fiber is calculated which is very close to the

Golden Mean, 1.618. The present study might provide a new interpretation for the reason why wool fiber has so many excellent properties.

I think every reader (even a niave one) can notice the confilict between the two abstracts, in the first fibre wool has dimension 4.2325 (which is greater than the embedding space) and in the second it is 1.618. I hope El naschie can explain these remarkable results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can imagine what sort of junk could be published in CSF journal.  You may not know that Huan is one of the great supporter of E-infinity theory and who nominated El naschie for a nobel prize!!!! </p>
<p>You can check yours self a typical paper for Huan using E-infinity theory, and I think a high school student can easily judge that this absolute trash. </p>
<p>Hierarchy of wool fibers and its interpretation using E-infinity theory</p>
<p>Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals,</p>
<p>Chaos,Solitons and Fractals 41 (2009)1839 –1841</p>
<p>Ji-Huan He, Zhong-Fu Ren, Jie Fan, Lan Xu</p>
<p>Abstract</p>
<p>Why do wool fibers show excellent advantages in warmth-retaining and many other practical properties? The paper concludes that their hierarchical structure is the key. Using E-infinity theory, its Hausdorff dimension is estimated to be about 4.2325, very close to El Naschie’s E-infinity dimension, 4.2360, revealing an optimal structure for wool fibers. </p>
<p>Then the same article again with little modifications</p>
<p>Hierarchy of Wool Fibers and Fractal Dimensions</p>
<p>International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation,9(3),293-296, 2008</p>
<p><a href="http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=103" rel="nofollow">http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=103</a></p>
<p>7&amp;context=ji_huan_he</p>
<p>Abstract</p>
<p>Wool fiber shows excellent advantages in warmth-retaining and many other practical properties possibly due to its hierarchical structure. Its fractal dimension of wool fiber is calculated which is very close to the</p>
<p>Golden Mean, 1.618. The present study might provide a new interpretation for the reason why wool fiber has so many excellent properties.</p>
<p>I think every reader (even a niave one) can notice the confilict between the two abstracts, in the first fibre wool has dimension 4.2325 (which is greater than the embedding space) and in the second it is 1.618. I hope El naschie can explain these remarkable results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/11/04/if-its-true-it-is-not-libel/comment-page-1/#comment-4834</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailund.dk/?p=1950#comment-4834</guid>
		<description>Now, now, temper, temper.  I can understand that Prof. El Naschie’s supporters are livid from the extent of the false accusations perpetuated by John Baez and his army.  Never the less you are now committing the same mistake.  You are turning a scientific discussion into a mud throwing match.  I find that intolerable and disgusting from both sides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, now, temper, temper.  I can understand that Prof. El Naschie’s supporters are livid from the extent of the false accusations perpetuated by John Baez and his army.  Never the less you are now committing the same mistake.  You are turning a scientific discussion into a mud throwing match.  I find that intolerable and disgusting from both sides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/11/04/if-its-true-it-is-not-libel/comment-page-1/#comment-4800</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 22:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailund.dk/?p=1950#comment-4800</guid>
		<description>Mr. Anyone.  If you would not be as stupid as you are you would be truly funny.  Regrettably we know very well your real name.  You are Said Salah Elnashaie the thief whose wife Shadia Shishini spent three years in a women’s prison for the stealing the money of Mohamed El Naschie’s mother.  Her conviction was squashed after she served her sentence you your conviction for two year’s hard labor still stands.  The last news I had you were hiding in Sinai with the Hashishine.  Your are disgracing the University of Sinai and its virtuous President Dr. Ratep.  I understand you are a direct descendant of some Hashishine.  I wonder if you know that the word assassin derives from the word Hashash.  I understand you are now specialized in character assassination.  You and your friends, John Baez, Renate Loll and Christoph Drosser have the nerves to talk about character?  You will be eternalized in the magna carta of no-good journalists and third rate chemical engineers.  God, you disgust me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Anyone.  If you would not be as stupid as you are you would be truly funny.  Regrettably we know very well your real name.  You are Said Salah Elnashaie the thief whose wife Shadia Shishini spent three years in a women’s prison for the stealing the money of Mohamed El Naschie’s mother.  Her conviction was squashed after she served her sentence you your conviction for two year’s hard labor still stands.  The last news I had you were hiding in Sinai with the Hashishine.  Your are disgracing the University of Sinai and its virtuous President Dr. Ratep.  I understand you are a direct descendant of some Hashishine.  I wonder if you know that the word assassin derives from the word Hashash.  I understand you are now specialized in character assassination.  You and your friends, John Baez, Renate Loll and Christoph Drosser have the nerves to talk about character?  You will be eternalized in the magna carta of no-good journalists and third rate chemical engineers.  God, you disgust me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/11/04/if-its-true-it-is-not-libel/comment-page-1/#comment-4738</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailund.dk/?p=1950#comment-4738</guid>
		<description>El naschie deserves the name of the great corrupter.

A lone single handed and with his own money.

He has managed to corrupt Elsevier for almost twenty

years, 1992-2009. He has published few hundered (347)

non sense articles in CSF. Up till now, Elsevier can not

get rid of him. There is no article for El naschie in

the recent article of 2009 in CSF, which is a good sign.

But most of the articles trumpeting the E-infinity theory

and citing El naschie works.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/

science?_ob=PublicationUR
L&amp;_tockey=%23TOC%235300%239999

%23999999999%2399999%23FLA%23&amp;
_cdi=5300&amp;_pubType=J&amp;_auth

=y&amp;_acct=C000050221&amp;_version=1&amp;_ur
lVersion=0&amp;_userid=10&amp;

md5=faf5d2a06ff9be6c0d0126fdc479017c

No
t only that but the great man (El naschie) has also

managed to corrupt Cambridge for ten years.

According to the following data base

http://www.engineeringvillage2.org

One can find:

17 articles where the affiliation is DAMTP, Cambridge,

UK.

72 articles where the affiliation is Dept. of Appl.

Math. &amp; Theor. Phys., Cambridge Univ., UK

40 articles where the affiliation is Univ of Cambridge.

No prize for one who guesses at which journal those

articles have been published.

All of these indicates the power of money not of self

publications or citations.

It is sad, that we lost the joke papers and now one can

not find any new paper for him. His papers are source of

infinite jokes.

The great man can establish his own publishing company

and calling it Elnaschievier to compete Elsevier in

publishing science fronteir.

We hope the great man not to waste a lot of time with

his socckpuppets and return producing lovely, joke

papers in Elnaschievier publishing house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>El naschie deserves the name of the great corrupter.</p>
<p>A lone single handed and with his own money.</p>
<p>He has managed to corrupt Elsevier for almost twenty</p>
<p>years, 1992-2009. He has published few hundered (347)</p>
<p>non sense articles in CSF. Up till now, Elsevier can not</p>
<p>get rid of him. There is no article for El naschie in</p>
<p>the recent article of 2009 in CSF, which is a good sign.</p>
<p>But most of the articles trumpeting the E-infinity theory</p>
<p>and citing El naschie works.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciencedirect.com/</a></p>
<p>science?_ob=PublicationUR<br />
L&amp;_tockey=%23TOC%235300%239999</p>
<p>%23999999999%2399999%23FLA%23&amp;<br />
_cdi=5300&amp;_pubType=J&amp;_auth</p>
<p>=y&amp;_acct=C000050221&amp;_version=1&amp;_ur<br />
lVersion=0&amp;_userid=10&amp;</p>
<p>md5=faf5d2a06ff9be6c0d0126fdc479017c</p>
<p>No<br />
t only that but the great man (El naschie) has also</p>
<p>managed to corrupt Cambridge for ten years.</p>
<p>According to the following data base</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engineeringvillage2.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.engineeringvillage2.org</a></p>
<p>One can find:</p>
<p>17 articles where the affiliation is DAMTP, Cambridge,</p>
<p>UK.</p>
<p>72 articles where the affiliation is Dept. of Appl.</p>
<p>Math. &amp; Theor. Phys., Cambridge Univ., UK</p>
<p>40 articles where the affiliation is Univ of Cambridge.</p>
<p>No prize for one who guesses at which journal those</p>
<p>articles have been published.</p>
<p>All of these indicates the power of money not of self</p>
<p>publications or citations.</p>
<p>It is sad, that we lost the joke papers and now one can</p>
<p>not find any new paper for him. His papers are source of</p>
<p>infinite jokes.</p>
<p>The great man can establish his own publishing company</p>
<p>and calling it Elnaschievier to compete Elsevier in</p>
<p>publishing science fronteir.</p>
<p>We hope the great man not to waste a lot of time with</p>
<p>his socckpuppets and return producing lovely, joke</p>
<p>papers in Elnaschievier publishing house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/11/04/if-its-true-it-is-not-libel/comment-page-1/#comment-4737</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailund.dk/?p=1950#comment-4737</guid>
		<description>The astonishing thing about El naschie is that he

could survive for a quit long time in Europe and remained as a Cheif editor of CS&amp;F for almost nearly twenty years.

Also, I think he managed to damage the reputation of Cambridge to some extent by publishing numerous non sense papers using its affiliation.

Furthermore, he damaged the reputation of Nobel laureate G. Thooft when he dedicated some of his non sense papers to G. Thooft - (On quarks confinement and asymptotic freedom Chaos,Solitons and Fractals 37 (2008)1289–1291)-

, surprisingly enough Thooft kept silent about this. I think even a third class physicist wouldn&#039;t be happy if El naschie dedicated one of his non sense paper to him, and for sure he would complain and sue El naschie.

It is a tempting suggestion to invoke the issue to sue Elsevier and El naschie for damaging the reputation of scientific publishing. I think that the respectable institutes, universities and research centers that paid for that junk CS&amp;F must sue Elsevier and El naschie and asking for penalties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The astonishing thing about El naschie is that he</p>
<p>could survive for a quit long time in Europe and remained as a Cheif editor of CS&amp;F for almost nearly twenty years.</p>
<p>Also, I think he managed to damage the reputation of Cambridge to some extent by publishing numerous non sense papers using its affiliation.</p>
<p>Furthermore, he damaged the reputation of Nobel laureate G. Thooft when he dedicated some of his non sense papers to G. Thooft &#8211; (On quarks confinement and asymptotic freedom Chaos,Solitons and Fractals 37 (2008)1289–1291)-</p>
<p>, surprisingly enough Thooft kept silent about this. I think even a third class physicist wouldn&#8217;t be happy if El naschie dedicated one of his non sense paper to him, and for sure he would complain and sue El naschie.</p>
<p>It is a tempting suggestion to invoke the issue to sue Elsevier and El naschie for damaging the reputation of scientific publishing. I think that the respectable institutes, universities and research centers that paid for that junk CS&amp;F must sue Elsevier and El naschie and asking for penalties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2009/11/04/if-its-true-it-is-not-libel/comment-page-1/#comment-4736</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailund.dk/?p=1950#comment-4736</guid>
		<description>This is just a typical abstract paper for one of the greatest member of E-infinity club namely Ji-Huan He and his company.

Hierarchy of wool fibers and its interpretation using E-infinity theory

Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals,

In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 9 August 2008

Ji-Huan He, Zhong-Fu Ren, Jie Fan, Lan Xu

Abstract

Why do wool fibers show excellent advantages in warmth-retaining and many other practical properties? The paper concludes that their hierarchical structure is the key. Using E-infinity theory, its Hausdorff dimension is estimated to be about 4.2325, very close to El Naschie’s E-infinity dimension, 4.2360, revealing an optimal structure for wool fibers.

I suggest for the next time that author study tefal coating and how things can&#039;t stick to it. And how this related to its fractal properties and in turn to its Hausdorff dimension. That is could be an amazing application of El naschie&#039;s E-infinity theory.

Of course this can explain that El naschie is using anti-tefal to stick forever to Elsevier even if he has set to retire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just a typical abstract paper for one of the greatest member of E-infinity club namely Ji-Huan He and his company.</p>
<p>Hierarchy of wool fibers and its interpretation using E-infinity theory</p>
<p>Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals,</p>
<p>In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 9 August 2008</p>
<p>Ji-Huan He, Zhong-Fu Ren, Jie Fan, Lan Xu</p>
<p>Abstract</p>
<p>Why do wool fibers show excellent advantages in warmth-retaining and many other practical properties? The paper concludes that their hierarchical structure is the key. Using E-infinity theory, its Hausdorff dimension is estimated to be about 4.2325, very close to El Naschie’s E-infinity dimension, 4.2360, revealing an optimal structure for wool fibers.</p>
<p>I suggest for the next time that author study tefal coating and how things can&#8217;t stick to it. And how this related to its fractal properties and in turn to its Hausdorff dimension. That is could be an amazing application of El naschie&#8217;s E-infinity theory.</p>
<p>Of course this can explain that El naschie is using anti-tefal to stick forever to Elsevier even if he has set to retire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

