This week in the blogs
Well, everyone else seems to summarise the posts they found interesting during the week, so it is only fair that I get to as well. Even with my new year resolution of posting on average a post per day, I cannot cover all the posts I find interesting, so it also gives me an opportunity to simply list a lot of links and perhaps group related posts so you have a chance of reading them together.
In this first installation, though, I’m going to go back a little further this month as well, though, since I collected a few interesting links there. Anyway, here goes:
Genetics
- Sequences from first settlers reveal rapid evolution in Icelandic mtDNA pool (PLoS Genetics)
- Genetic variation in space & time – Iceland (Gene Expression)
- The genetic history of Iceland (Genetic Future)
- Ancient DNA analysis of the Icelandic settlers (Me!)
- Genetic drift eliminated rare mtDNA haplotypes from Iceland (John Hawks)
- mtDNA selection in Iceland? (John Hawks)
- Pervasive Hitchhiking at coding and regulatory sites in humans (PLoS Genetics)
- Humans have adapted on genome-wide level? (Gene Expression)
- How much selection is going on in humans? (Me!)
- A genome-wide genetic signature of Jewish ancestry perfectly separates individuals with and without full Jewish ancestry in a large random sample of European Americans (Genome Biology)
- How Ashkenazi Jewish are you? (Gene Expression)
- Another paper on Ashkenazi Jewish distinctiveness (Dienekes)
Sequences and alignments
- Phylogenetic inference under recombination using Bayesian stochastic topology selection (Bioinformatics)
- The experts agree (Finchtalk)
Programming
- Dynamic languages: Not just for scripting any more (CIO)
- Emacs 23 (emacs-fu)
Teaching
- Making classes interactive: better learning or just more fun? (Discovering Biology in a Digital World)
- TeacherTube: YouTube for teachers (Discovering Biology in a Digital World)
- Students know what physicists believe, but they don’t agree: A study using the CLASS survey (Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ.)
- Students know what physicists belive, but they don’t agree (Uncertain Principles)
Peer reviewing
- How are the mighty fallen (Michael Nielsen)
- Three myths about scientific peer review (Michael Nielsen)
–
25-40=-15
January 26th, 2009 at 6:25 am
Very nice blog and this particular post, I hope this will be a regular section of your blog
January 26th, 2009 at 6:42 am
I hope to make it so. At least if I can collect enough interesting links per week. Otherwise it might be bi-weekly or monthly, but I’ll try to keep it up at least.