<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Heads or tails and reliable alignments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2008/03/23/heads-or-tails-and-reliable-alignments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2008/03/23/heads-or-tails-and-reliable-alignments/</link>
	<description>Computer science, bioinformatics, genetics, and everything in between</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:35:39 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed A. Cartwright</title>
		<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2008/03/23/heads-or-tails-and-reliable-alignments/comment-page-1/#comment-1002</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed A. Cartwright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2008/03/23/heads-or-tails-and-reliable-alignments/#comment-1002</guid>
		<description>I whole heartedly agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I whole heartedly agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Mailund</title>
		<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2008/03/23/heads-or-tails-and-reliable-alignments/comment-page-1/#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Mailund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2008/03/23/heads-or-tails-and-reliable-alignments/#comment-996</guid>
		<description>My feeling is that we should ignore the alignment altogether (in most cases) and focus on the analysis we &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; want to do.  In most cases, we use the alignment as a step towards some other analysis, and I would be much happier to consider the alignment missing data and (to the extend possible) just integrate it out of the equation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My feeling is that we should ignore the alignment altogether (in most cases) and focus on the analysis we <em>really</em> want to do.  In most cases, we use the alignment as a step towards some other analysis, and I would be much happier to consider the alignment missing data and (to the extend possible) just integrate it out of the equation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed A. Cartwright</title>
		<link>http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2008/03/23/heads-or-tails-and-reliable-alignments/comment-page-1/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed A. Cartwright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 14:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailund.dk/index.php/2008/03/23/heads-or-tails-and-reliable-alignments/#comment-990</guid>
		<description>In my alignment program, Ngila, I made choices about how to break ties to give a &quot;pretty&quot; alignment.  IIRC, I chose to shift gaps as far right as they can go, which means reversing the sequences will give you a different alignment.

However, I&#039;m not a big fan of relying too much on &quot;optimal&quot; alignments.  I&#039;d rather see more approaches treat alignments are hidden data and try to optimize around their set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my alignment program, Ngila, I made choices about how to break ties to give a &#8220;pretty&#8221; alignment.  IIRC, I chose to shift gaps as far right as they can go, which means reversing the sequences will give you a different alignment.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m not a big fan of relying too much on &#8220;optimal&#8221; alignments.  I&#8217;d rather see more approaches treat alignments are hidden data and try to optimize around their set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

